The Five Demands

Families claim soldiers given go ahead to shoot-to-kill (BBC News Northern Ireland)

Some families of people shot dead by the Army during the Troubles claim they have found evidence that soldiers were given a green light to shoot-to-kill.
Relatives for Justice said it has seen secret documents which proves the Army was given a virtual amnesty.
It said senior government and Army figures agreed the move during a meeting on 10 July 1972.
The MoD said the document appeared to be a note on discussions not decisions on matters of judicial accountability.

Gerald Gibson, 16, was shot dead in west Belfast by a soldier a day later.
The 16-year-old was one of 496 people killed during the bloodiest year of the troubles.
He was shot dead by a soldier as he stood with a group of friends in the Lenadoon area on the afternoon of 11 July 1972.
The Army initially claimed they had killed an IRA gunman, but that claim was quickly discounted.

Meeting

A short-lived IRA ceasefire had ended just 48 hours earlier, shortly after the British government had flown provisional leaders including Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness to London for secret talks with the Secretary of State, William Whitelaw.
The day after the ceasefire ended, on 10 July, a meeting took place at Stormont Castle to discuss the government’s security response.
It was attended by Mr Whitelaw, the head of the Army in Northern Ireland, the deputy chief constable of the RUC and senior civil servants.

It was the day after that meeting when Gerard Gibson was shot dead.
He was one of 79 people killed by the Army that year, the vast majority of them civilians.
No soldiers faced court proceedings for any of the killings.
The teenager’s family believe a secret account of the meeting in Stormont Castle recently discovered in the public records office explains why.
It was discovered by the group Relatives for Justice, which campaigns on behalf of the families of people shot dead by the army.

The minutes of the meeting outline what was discussed, and the decisions taken about the security response.
It notes that the end of the IRA ceasefire was marked by nearly 200 shooting incidents. These included the killings of six civilians, including a Catholic priest, by the Army.
Strategy
The document then states: “If the Army did not now attack the IRA the probability was that the UDA would.”
It goes on to outline a series of decisions taken “after discussions of the political and strategical factors”.
These included an announcement declaring “the government’s intention to carry on the war with the IRA with the utmost vigour”.
The document said more troops and equipment would be needed for planned operations, and that plans “were urgently needed for the containment of areas known to harbour bombers and gunmen”.
The document also states that “the Army should not be inhibited in its campaign by the threat of court proceedings and should therefore be suitably indemnified”.
Gerard Gibson’s family said they believe it explains why no-one has ever been prosecuted in connection with his killing, and those of others shot by soldiers.

“We were shocked when we saw this document,” said his sister Margaret Gibson.
“Basically what we take from this document was that the British Army was told go and do what they wanted, without fear of prosecution and it seems my brother was an innocent party, and they just took his life.”

Indemnity

The group that discovered the document said it has huge political and legal implications.
“This is the first document that has ever been revealed that talks about indemnifying soldiers from court proceedings,” said Relatives for Justice director Mark Thompson.
“It is an amnesty, it is impunity and that’s what we have always believed. Now we have the concrete evidence that shows that the impunity existed,” he said.
Mr Thompson said such an amnesty would be “illegal under domestic and international law and the document proves it happened”.

The family of Gerard Gibson and others killed by soldiers plan to use the document in a legal action against the Ministry of Defence.
“We would like to see a prosecution,” said Ms Gibson.
“We would like to see them held to account.”

In a statement the Ministry of Defence said: “Whilst not in a position to comment in detail on a document we have not seen it would appear this is a note of discussions, not decisions on matters of judicial accountability.
“The meeting appears to have been chaired by another government department and the Defence forces in Northern Ireland have always worked within the law and have always been fully accountable for their actions.”